HOME   People do good because they are human, not because they are religious! 

Do not give God any credit for the good they do, they did it!

 

THERE IS NO ARCHAELOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

There was a tomb found in a Jerusalem suburb in 1945 and inside it there were ossuaries or jars of bones and on two of them the name of Jesus appears. The first has Jesus help in Greek. The second has Jesus let him arise in Aramaic. The tomb was believed to have been closed in 50 AD.
 
Dishonest Christians like Michael Green (Runaway World, page 26) take this to be proof of the historicity of Jesus and others go as far as to take the Jesus let him arise to evince first century awareness that Jesus himself had risen and so was able to raise the dead. But these references prove nothing like that. You can pray to an imaginary god and ask him to raise people up. The pagans did that all the time. And one would wonder why only two jars were written on when there were several in the tomb. If only two jars contained Christian bones it is impossible to believe that the relatives who would have been Jewish would have agreed with such inscriptions which were religiously offensive to most Jews. It was a Jewish tomb. And the inscriptions appearing on two jars and not them all seems to be sectarian and offensive. And why one in Greek and the other in Aramaic? And why different prayers? It would have been more natural for the prayer for resurrection to appear on both. And why pray to Jesus to make the person arise as if he wasn’t going to do it anyway? The prayer hints that Jesus did NOT rise again for he never proved that he could raise people up or would do it. But nevertheless the problems suggest to me that some pair wrote the inscriptions long after 50 AD particularly when they are just crude scratches. They were scribbled in a hurry and whoever did it made no effort to do it right.

The Catholic newspaper, The Universe (October 27, 2002, page 3), discusses the find of an ossuary made of limestone which contained an Aramaic inscription running, James, Son of Joseph, Brother of Jesus”. The ossuary was found by a French archaeologist from a collector who bought it from a man who said he stole it from a cave in Jerusalem. Some scholars believe that the find is genuine. Andre Lemaire thinks the inscription refers to Jesus Christ. He dates the box to 63 AD.
 
Many scholars of the highest calibre think he was being hasty. The paper admits that if this inscription is genuine it is the only physical artefact related to the existence of Jesus that has ever been found. Lemaire thinks that because the brother being mentioned is very unusual this Jesus must have been someone unique, someone famous like Jesus Christ. The writing style seems to indicate a first century origin. There are plenty of college educated people who could have inscribed on the ossuary. The origins of the ossuary are obscure and there are no bones inside it which does not bode well for the authenticity of the inscription. And if it is real, there were plenty of Jameses who had fathers called Joseph and who had brothers called Jesus. And as for the reference to a brother called Jesus, if there was another James in the same tomb who was the son of another Joseph the first James would have to have his brother mentioned to avert confusion. The most plausible answer for the problem of why the brother Jesus was mentioned was because Jesus was the owner of the tomb. Most experts prefer this idea. If so, then the Jesus was not Jesus Christ who had to be buried in a borrowed tomb. It is a fact that brother of Jesus could have been added to the box for the handwriting of the inscription indicates the possibility that two men put the inscription on. And there was no way James who was so loved by the Jews would have had Jesus mentioned on his ossuary. The Jews did not like Jesus and wanted heretics like him to be forgotten.

The Catholic Church opposes the discovery’s authenticity fearing it undermines the Catholic claim that Mary was always a virgin and that Jesus was her only child.
 
The ossuary when its inscription is so bizarre could be evidence that there was no Jesus for somebody could have scribbled on it in the first century to provide some.
 
Ossuaries often have no names on them. There was no need to for nobody needed the names on a box that was never going to leave a tomb. All that mattered was knowing which family the tomb belonged to. That is why inscriptions are very often very suspect. Joseph as spelt on the ossuary is an error. The ossuary of Caiaphas uses a different spelling. Part of the James inscription is illegible which is odd for this illegibility starts in mid-sentence as if there was some inept tampering person at work. The ossuary even uses Yeshuwa for Jesus which is a bit unusual and there is no evidence that this name was ever used for this person, Jesus Christ.

How convenient that the bones are not available for DNA comparison with the Turin Shroud too! If James and Jesus were related we could soon prove that if the Shroud and the bones are authentic. Many scholars particularly in Israel are adamant that the second part of the inscription is a forgery for it is so poor and different from the rest that it must have been the work of another carver perhaps from the third century. Rochelle I Altman and the palaeographer Ada Yardeni have declared the second part to be a poor amateurish fake. If it is from the third century then we must ask why somebody then had to do such a seemingly bizarre thing. Was it to provide evidence for Jesus that was lacking meaning there were scholars then who were saying there was no reason to regard Jesus as a real historical person? It cannot be doubted that the early Christians were demons when it came to scribbling graffiti so even if there was no evidence for the inscription being unreal it could still be the case that it is just another bizarre example of Christian scribbling. Christians always were eager to produce fake relics of revered saints.

On June 18th, 2003, the news came from Jerusalem that Israeli Officials stated that the James inscription and a few others were inauthentic. The reference to brother of Jesus was recognised as a later addition for it was not inscribed at the same time as the first bit. The owner of the James ossuary tried to sell it and the investigations were the result of police interest as well. The Israeli Officials are definite that the reference to Jesus was added to the inscription in modern times. It was found suspicious that the ossuary appeared in a year in which there was a spate of interest and books about James.
 
Some have been saying that the inscription on the ossuary being of recent origin does not mean it is inauthentic because somebody might have re-written it to make it clearer! Desperation is a terrible scourge.



  
WORKS CONSULTED

A Concise History of the Catholic Church, Thomas Bokenkotter, Image Books, New York, 1979
Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible, John W Haley, Whitaker House, Pennsylvania, undated
Asking them Questions, Various, Oxford University Press, London, 1936
Belief and Make-Believe, GA Wells, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1991
Concise Guide to Today’s Religions, Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Scripture Press, Bucks, 1983
Conspiracies and the Cross, Timothy Paul Jones, Front Line, A Strang Company, Florida, 2008
Did Jesus Exist? GA Wells, Pemberton, London, 1988
Did Jesus Exist? John Redford, Catholic Truth Society, London, 1986
Documents of the Christian Church, edited by Henry Bettenson, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979
Early Christian Writings, Maxwell Staniforth Editor, Penguin, London, 1988
Encyclopaedia of Heresies and Heretics, Leonard George, Robson Books, London, 1995
Encyclopaedia of Unbelief, Volume 1, Ed Gordon Stein, (Ed) Prometheus Books, New York, 1985
Evidence that Demands a Verdict, Vol 1, Josh McDowell, Alpha, Scripture Press Foundation, Bucks, 1995
Handbook to the Controversy With Rome, Volume 1, Karl Von Hase, The Religious Tract Society, London, 1906
He Walked Among Us, Josh McDowell and Bill Wilson, Alpha Cumbria, 2000
In Defence of the Faith, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1996
Introduction to the New Testament, Roderick A F MacKenzie, SJ, Liturgical Press, Minnesota, 1965
Jesus, AN Wilson, Flamingo, London, 1993
Jesus and the Goddess, The Secret Teachings of the Original Christians, Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy, Thorsons, London, 2001
Jesus – God the Son or Son of God? Fred Pearce Christadelphian Publishing Office, Birmingham, undated
Jesus – One Hundred Years Before Christ, Professor Alvar Ellegard Century, London, 1999
Jesus and the Four Gospels, John Drane, Lion, Herts, 1984
Jesus Hypotheses, V Messori, St Paul Publications, Slough, 1977
Jesus Lived in India by Holger Kersten, Element, Dorset, 1994
Jesus, Qumran and the Vatican, Otto Betz and Rainer Riesner, SCM Press Ltd, London, 1994
Jesus the Evidence, Ian Wilson, Pan, London, 1985
Jesus the Magician, Morton Smith, Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1978
Jesus under Fire, Edited by Michael F Wilkins and JP Moreland, Zondervan Publishing House, Michigan, 1995
Lectures and Replies, Thomas Carr, Archbishop of Melbourne, Melbourne, 1907
Let’s Weigh the Evidence, Barry Burton, Chick Publications, Chino, CA, 1983
Miracles in Dispute, Ernst and Marie-Luise Keller, SCM Press Ltd, London, 1969
Nag Hammadi Library, Ed James M Robinson HarperCollins New York 1990
On the True Doctrine, Celsus, Translated by R Joseph Hoffmann, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987
Putting Away Childish Things, Uta Ranke-Heinemann, HarperCollins, San Francisco, 1994
Runaway World, Michael Green, IVP, London, 1974
St Paul versus St Peter, A Tale of Two Missions, Michael Goulder, Westminster John Knox Press, Louisville, Kentucky, 1994
St Peter and Rome, JBS, Irish Church Missions, Dublin, undated
Saint Saul, Donald Harman Akenson, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000
The Bible Fact or Fantasy, John Drane, Lion, Oxford, 1989
The Bible Unearthed, Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman, Touchstone Books, New York, 2002.
The Call to Heresy, Robert Van Weyer, Lamp Books, London, 1989
The Case For Christ, Lee Strobel, HarperCollins and Zondervan, Michigan, 1998
The Case for Jesus the Messiah, John Ankerberg Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1989
The Early Church, Henry Chadwick, Pelican, Middlesex, 1967
The Encyclopedia of Heresies and Heretics, Leonard George, Robson Books, London, 1995
The First Christian, Karen Armstrong, Pan, London, 1983
The Gnostic Gospels, Elaine Pagels, Penguin, London, 1990
The Gnostic Paul, Elaine Pagels, Fortress Press, Philadelphia, 1975
The History of Christianity, Lion, Herts 1982
The History of the Church, Eusebius, Penguin, London, 1989
The House of the Messiah, Ahmed Osman, Grafton, London, 1993
The Jesus Event and Our Response, Martin R Tripole SJ, Alba House, New York, 1980
The Jesus Hoax, Phyllis Graham, Leslie Frewin, London, 1974
The Jesus Mysteries, Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy, Thorsons, London, 1999
The MythMaker, St Paul and the Invention of Christianity, Hyam Maccoby, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London, 1986
The Reconstruction of Belief, Charles Gore DD, John Murray, London, 1930
The Search for the Twelve Apostles, William Steuart McBirnie, Tyndale House, 1997
The Secret Gospel Morton Smith Aquarian Press, Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1985
The Truth of Christianity, WH Turton, Wells Gardner, Darton & Co Ltd, London, 1905
The Unauthorised Version, Robin Lane Fox, Penguin, Middlesex, 1992
The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus, Raymond E Brown, Paulist Press, New York, 1973
Theodore Parker’s Discourses, Theodore Parker, Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer, London, 1876
Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Kittel Gerhard and Friedrich Gerhard, Eerdman’s Publishing Co, Grand Rapids, MI, 1976
Those Incredible Christians, Hugh Schonfield, Hutchinson, London, 1968
Who Was Jesus? A Conspiracy in Jerusalem, by Kamal Salabi, I.B. Taurus and Co Ltd., London, 1992
Who Was Jesus? NT Wright, SPCK, London, 1993
Why I Believe Jesus Lived, C G Colly Caldwell, Guardian of Truth, Kentucky
 
The WWW

Who is GA Wells? Rev Dr Gregory S. Neal
www.errantskeptics.org/G_A_Wells.htm

The Silent Jesus
www.askwhy.co.uk/awcnotes/cn4/0325SilentJesus.html#Justin

Apollonius the Nazarene, The Historical Apollonius versus the Historical Jesus
www.apollonius.net/bernard1e.html

Why Did the Apostles Die? Dave Matson,
 www.infidels.org/library/magazines/tsr/1997/4Why97.html
 
The “Historical” Jesus by Acharya S
www.truthbeknown.com/historicaljc.htm

How Did the Apostles Die?
www.infidels.org/library/magazines/tsr/1997/4/4front97.html

History’s Troubling Silence About Jesus, Lee Salisbury
www.secweb.org/asset.asp?AssetID=102

Steven Carr discusses the Christian and apostolic martyrs
www.bowness.demon.co.uk/martyrs.htm
www.bowness.demon.co.uk/martyrs2.htm

Challenging the Verdict
A Cross-Examination of Lee Strobel’s The Case for Christ
http://human.st/jesuspuzzle/CTVExcerptsOne.htm
http://human.st/jesuspuzzle/CTVExcerptsTwo.htm
http://human.st/jesuspuzzle/CTVExcerptsThree.htm#Twelve

The Martyrdoms of Peter and Paul, Peter Kirby
http://home.earthlink.net/~kirby/

The Martyrdoms: A Response, Peter Kirby
www.bowness.demon.co.uk/martyrs3.htm

A Sacrifice in Heaven,
http://human.st/jesuspuzzle/supp09.htm

The Evolution of Jesus of Nazareth
http://human.st/jesuspuzzle/partthre.htm

The Jesus of History, a Reply to Josh McDowell by Gordon Stein
 www.infidels.org/library/modern/gordon_stein/Jesus.html

Josh McDowell’s Evidence for Jesus – Is It Reliable?, by Jeffrey J Lowder www.infidels.org/library/modern/jeff_lowder/jury/chap5.html

A Reply to JP Holding’s “Shattering” of My Views on Jesus
www.infidels.org/secular_web/new/2000/march.html

Robert M Price, Christ a Fiction
www.infidels.org/library/modern/robert_price/fiction.html

Earliest Christianity G A Wells
www.infidels.org/library/modern/g_a_wells/earliest.html

The Second Century Apologists
http://human.st/jesuspuzzle/century.htm

Existence of Jesus Controversy, Rae West
www.homeusers.prestel.co.uk/littleton/gm1_jesu.htm

Why I Don’t Buy the Resurrection Story by Richard Carrier
www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/resurrection/index.shtml

Jesus Conference,
www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_sd/jconf_hall.html
 
Jesus Conference,
www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_sd/jconf_stuckenbruck.html
 
The Testament of Levi Concerning the Priesthood and Arrogance
www.ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-08/anf08-07.htm#P378_53868.

Sherlock Holmes Style Search for the Historical Jesus
www.fortunecity.com/greenfield/bp/890/history.html
 
The Ascension of Isaiah
www.earth-history.com/sacred-ascension-Isaiah.htm

Apollonius of Tyana: The Monkey of Christ? The Church Patriarchs, Robertino Solarion www.apollonius.net/patriarchs.html

What About the Discovery of Q? Brad Bromling
www.ApologeticsPress.org
 
Wells without Water, Psychological Buffoonry from the Master of the Christ-Myth, James Patrick Holding
www.tektonics.org/JPH_WW.html

Critique: Scott Bidstrp [sic] on The Case for Christ by James Patrick Holding
www.tektonics.org/bidstrup02.html

GA Wells Replies to Criticism of his Books on Jesus
www.infidels.org/library/modern/g_a_wells/errant.html

The Ossuary Scam: A Critical Analysis of the “James” Ossuary
http://www.atrueword.com/index.php/article/articleprint/15/-1/1/

The Origins of Christianity and the Quest for the Historical Jesus, Acharya S
www.truthbeknown.com/origins.htm

BIBLE VERSION USED
 
The Amplified Bible
The King James Version